To heck with the party or pot, it's the dome.
From the Pan to the FRY, it may be an{L}* of a project.
*see hecuva
(FP1)
Showing posts with label LA Times. Show all posts
Showing posts with label LA Times. Show all posts
Thursday, February 14, 2013
Wednesday, January 23, 2013
Certain Sources...
(now there is a sticky wicket)...
(like "some people")...
My bottom line or actually my sub-heading(un-Tan-Gent-Ed) was that some people cannot possibly read all that they pass on, but it could be just me. ( update** ) Labels do not do justice, but again that is probably me too. Bloggers*** should be called something other than journalists, infotainment may be the ticket. But again my point is that the devil is in the details, sometimes between the lines, and certainly not absolute. In some cases, not certain, full reads are not required.
BTW: It was not my intent to cast aspersions on the prior post with my photo. But it is relevant(bull) and an appropriate image(below) that I cannot even return (1) to all I might like to read (2) or reference. (3)
* (bracketed inserts in the flow of conversation and reading the heading)
** approximate timing of update
*** leaving mainstream and cable networks aside
(1) "two points reference* a line
(2) "This is one to savor"
(3) NBC / Text
[I have viewed the 2nd inaugural speech, but it bears review and revisiting.]
[Lunch hour stop at The Cycle, finds Hillary testifying in Congress. Bearing in mind who should sack certain someones. ]
(like "some people")...
...or Filters need Filtering.*
But my point of departure is the cutting word. "Certain" itself is parsed as I have bracketed.My bottom line or actually my sub-heading(un-Tan-Gent-Ed) was that some people cannot possibly read all that they pass on, but it could be just me. ( update** ) Labels do not do justice, but again that is probably me too. Bloggers*** should be called something other than journalists, infotainment may be the ticket. But again my point is that the devil is in the details, sometimes between the lines, and certainly not absolute. In some cases, not certain, full reads are not required.
BTW: It was not my intent to cast aspersions on the prior post with my photo. But it is relevant(bull) and an appropriate image(below) that I cannot even return (1) to all I might like to read (2) or reference. (3)
* (bracketed inserts in the flow of conversation and reading the heading)
** approximate timing of update
*** leaving mainstream and cable networks aside
(1) "two points reference* a line
(2) "This is one to savor"
(3) NBC / Text
[I have viewed the 2nd inaugural speech, but it bears review and revisiting.]
[Lunch hour stop at The Cycle, finds Hillary testifying in Congress. Bearing in mind who should sack certain someones. ]
Thursday, August 09, 2012
Cut the Cow Pie!
"Open source intelligence" or We Gee Bored?
Or grow the pie?
SEGUE:
Not to pun on CP or PC, but Craven Politics?
I think we found the opposite of PC, or pie cutter.
That's a more eh?
My original intent was to pun or posit the opposite of PC.
Politial Correctness, the Whine of Progress.
But it*** may be parsed* as Craven -v- Politics.
* Romney / Obama
[Foot note or b**PS ?]
**(ad?s) wonting to avoid gee/PS.
*** that posit
[Pardon my dimentional(and anachronistic) asterisks and acronyms, but B**ingo.]
[Note under ac"ron"yms is an anachronism. i.e. late link re: callus political calculus ]
[speaking of anachronism: just turning on Thom Hartmann with Mike Papantonio with caller on justice appointments question of obstruction and my pinnacle of politics]
[Note (2.0) The triangles are not the pie(or pi cutter), they are two dimensional, i.e. a tetrahedron. Speaking of spell check. ]
NOTE: Charts of Sorts.
Or grow the pie?
SEGUE:
Not to pun on CP or PC, but Craven Politics?
I think we found the opposite of PC, or pie cutter.
That's a more eh?
My original intent was to pun or posit the opposite of PC.
Politial Correctness, the Whine of Progress.
But it*** may be parsed* as Craven -v- Politics.
* Romney / Obama
[Foot note or b**PS ?]
**(ad?s) wonting to avoid gee/PS.
*** that posit
[Pardon my dimentional(and anachronistic) asterisks and acronyms, but B**ingo.]
[Note under ac"ron"yms is an anachronism. i.e. late link re: callus political calculus ]
[speaking of anachronism: just turning on Thom Hartmann with Mike Papantonio with caller on justice appointments question of obstruction and my pinnacle of politics]
[Note (2.0) The triangles are not the pie(or pi cutter), they are two dimensional, i.e. a tetrahedron. Speaking of spell check. ]
NOTE: Charts of Sorts.
Sunday, June 24, 2012
Enough Smirking!
The Sport of Stairs!
Well
... a bit of a Tan gent.
Not [!]
[This is a bit of a Mitt-Flop from a long story short. But you learn something everyday. In my case it is very embarassing, having constucted a home, that yes it is proper to use a stair for a step, as long as you don't trip. Not to mention where I may have gone if I had had more sports. But if it is not too late, don't miss the Stairs link. It covers one of several topics covered at a weekend get together with friends. Taxes that is. Not to mention dressage*. Little did I know that I actually know someone who participates in that sport.]
* well not in the same link, don't forget the sport.
6-25-12 ["a" / "gent" brackets the meta 4, not to mention hard ware or punchline.]
Not my original intent [!][?][?]
[But certainly part of the puzzle, is immigration and citizens united and who cares! Nail? Emigration is as important as immigration, no new taxes does not mean old taxes aren't fine and public option is not a man date or woe man.]
[RM Nix On MR /on M B]
[I of Needle ? ... One legged** coffee table! "Papers Please Ruling." Take 3/4?]
** This originated in a pun on Brewer and the SCOTUS in their two rulings today. Three of the four key ingredients of 1070 were over-turned and the only one standing duplicates federal law. So basically it was overturned and leaves the state with existing law. In the Citizens United/Montana ruling federal law was upheld as well, or rather state law was over-turned as well. To keep this from getting messy, I will simply insert a few Ed Schultz links.
6-26-12 Robert Reich on the same page.
LA Times "reality check".
G P S Cross Rhodes ?
Nav Grid ? / Ambiguous De- sign. (ouch ?)
[Ambiguous Muddle: Andrea Mitchell*** NoPR]
*** Ctrl F "inconvenient" "follow-up" of No Labels BS
Hell***N?
AM AG Definition Gap! Atlantic Pacific / Oceans Don't Protect Us.
[Issa attacks Obama Weakness: C-NewsNation (not looking back @ B*S*)
Hunch Left on the Table. "Court of Public Opinion" Bin/go!
Cause Ma*l Oh Ge!]
[Note: last four uses of asterisks are simply place holders, as in the last case for "u" or "l" or even no place holder. Not to mention ! Spin Cycle ?
Alternate Legs ?]
[Newt Romney Business Man (Green Economy)(Read Levi a thon)?]
[Victory VictiMothy: '68 yada yada]
Well
... a bit of a Tan gent.
Not [!]
[This is a bit of a Mitt-Flop from a long story short. But you learn something everyday. In my case it is very embarassing, having constucted a home, that yes it is proper to use a stair for a step, as long as you don't trip. Not to mention where I may have gone if I had had more sports. But if it is not too late, don't miss the Stairs link. It covers one of several topics covered at a weekend get together with friends. Taxes that is. Not to mention dressage*. Little did I know that I actually know someone who participates in that sport.]
* well not in the same link, don't forget the sport.
6-25-12 ["a" / "gent" brackets the meta 4, not to mention hard ware or punchline.]
Not my original intent [!][?][?]
[But certainly part of the puzzle, is immigration and citizens united and who cares! Nail? Emigration is as important as immigration, no new taxes does not mean old taxes aren't fine and public option is not a man date or woe man.]
[RM Nix On MR /on M B]
[I of Needle ? ... One legged** coffee table! "Papers Please Ruling." Take 3/4?]
** This originated in a pun on Brewer and the SCOTUS in their two rulings today. Three of the four key ingredients of 1070 were over-turned and the only one standing duplicates federal law. So basically it was overturned and leaves the state with existing law. In the Citizens United/Montana ruling federal law was upheld as well, or rather state law was over-turned as well. To keep this from getting messy, I will simply insert a few Ed Schultz links.
6-26-12 Robert Reich on the same page.
LA Times "reality check".
G P S Cross Rhodes ?
Nav Grid ? / Ambiguous De- sign. (ouch ?)
[Ambiguous Muddle: Andrea Mitchell*** NoPR]
*** Ctrl F "inconvenient" "follow-up" of No Labels BS
Hell***N?
AM AG Definition Gap! Atlantic Pacific / Oceans Don't Protect Us.
[Issa attacks Obama Weakness: C-NewsNation (not looking back @ B*S*)
Hunch Left on the Table. "Court of Public Opinion" Bin/go!
Cause Ma*l Oh Ge!]
[Note: last four uses of asterisks are simply place holders, as in the last case for "u" or "l" or even no place holder. Not to mention ! Spin Cycle ?
Alternate Legs ?]
[Newt Romney Business Man (Green Economy)(Read Levi a thon)?]
[Victory VictiMothy: '68 yada yada]
Thursday, May 03, 2012
Thursday, April 12, 2012
WOE / Wae
War on Executives:
I am not saying that the Republicans are waging a war on women or that Democrats are not saying it. I am saying there are two questions which I will not answer, who started the war and who started calling it a war? I am also saying that I have not found the evidence in the links attached here, and suggesting that there is a war no matter who calls it a war or who started calling it a war.
I have yet to find who started the claim that there is a war on women. I am not saying that I don't believe that Obama could have used the term*, I just haven't found it.**
I have yet to find who started the claim that there is a war on women. I am not saying that I don't believe that Obama could have used the term*, I just haven't found it.**
* war on women, war against women, war for women...'s votes.
[Google of the Day? Is it an anomaly that Steve Benen on Rachel Maddow Blog is the second hit for the question. "When did..." re-framed as "Has President Obama said there is a war on women?" Third Frame: "Obama talks about war on women." Fourth fishing trip? No War on Women. WOW! ]
[Jumping in the Lakoff! But Republicans cannot win the VFW.(Victory for Women or Victory from Whining.) It is a victory for wordplay.]
** added 4-13-12 (** that is) Haven't found the President using the term but Debbie Wasserman-Schultz is quoted using it without full context in the CSM.
Saturday, March 31, 2012
Out of the Blue?
Monday, January 23, 2012
Update
Somewhere I may have noted that Herman Cain said he would have a surprise before the South Carolina primaries. I haven't found that reference, but I wonder if this was it.
Speaking of Updates.
Not to mention Martin Bashir and Heads Examined. Tea Party Nation leader endorses candidate who literally* in his own words, needs his head examined. Who wants anybody to be on food stamps? Certainly not the president. The Gingrich claim that Obama is the "food stamp president" while coming close to being... [1-24-12: I chose to break mid-semantics as to the truth of claims. Judson Philips quote: "if you want someone to be on food stamps you really ought have your head examined" yet Gingrich thinks that is what Obama wants.** If you think the NAACP should demand pay checks not food stamps, what does that make you? That is what Gingrich charged them with.]
*1-24-12 in con text m/un-con science links/break
[?]
[To be read: Ryan Lizza The New Yorker, The Obama Memos.]
[1-27-12]
Tuesday, August 30, 2011
SinCronyCity
or the Un-Try-Pod?
Well, not exactly.
The Un-Pun?
Just in case there is any question, I love humor and a lot of other things.
But this* is serious.
The original inspiration was a missing link, in regards to an article on a potential Fed Stimulus or QE3, which I had printed out and carried around before misplacing(unless I have embedded it somewhere) associated with the Krugman's Bernanke's Perry Problem in the New York Times with the synchronicity triggered by the Brian Morton piece.(a link on the same virtual page) Not that I believe there are any acausal events, especially in** economics, politics or religion.
*not the point but see bold links
** update charts label
[Oh what a mug we weave...
[No synchronicity? Robert Reich*** on Martin Bashir.]
*** link not there yet (OK NOW) [Not to mention: Dylan Ratigan on Social Media Trending Dangerously [8-31-11 link found], Bingo on Hardball, with Eugene Robinson, and retro Last Word. But actually while I am waiting, the president's jobs plan will probably be more of the same, and it should be, more of everything he compromised on and the Republicans blocked.]
[Charts Label Updated back thru 2011]
[8-31-11 Label Institute for New Economic Thinking]
Well, not exactly.
The Un-Pun?
Just in case there is any question, I love humor and a lot of other things.
But this* is serious.
The original inspiration was a missing link, in regards to an article on a potential Fed Stimulus or QE3, which I had printed out and carried around before misplacing(unless I have embedded it somewhere) associated with the Krugman's Bernanke's Perry Problem in the New York Times with the synchronicity triggered by the Brian Morton piece.(a link on the same virtual page) Not that I believe there are any acausal events, especially in** economics, politics or religion.
*not the point but see bold links
** update charts label
[Oh what a mug we weave...
Fed's Ben Bernanke opens door to further economic stimulusFederal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke tells Congress that he expects no quick improvement in the weak job market, and says the central bank is prepared to take steps to aid the economy if necessary. But he suggests nothing is imminent....not to dis Krugman but discuss Perry.]
[No synchronicity? Robert Reich*** on Martin Bashir.]
*** link not there yet (OK NOW) [Not to mention: Dylan Ratigan on Social Media Trending Dangerously [8-31-11 link found], Bingo on Hardball, with Eugene Robinson, and retro Last Word. But actually while I am waiting, the president's jobs plan will probably be more of the same, and it should be, more of everything he compromised on and the Republicans blocked.]
[Charts Label Updated back thru 2011]
[8-31-11 Label Institute for New Economic Thinking]
Monday, August 15, 2011
Sunday, May 01, 2011
SHOCK and Awe!
Shock to hear the anouncement by President Obama
that Osama bin Laden has been killed.
Awe at the amount[*] of celebrations[***] that have sprung up.
UPDATES AS DATED:
Tuesday, May 03, 2011
President Obama Announcement
Rachel Maddow , National Outpouring
Temporal Importance
[Daily KOS
The Telegraph McCain and Bush Too.]
Slate: How White House kept a secret.
MSNBC Pakistan "Double Game"
Today Show Yesterday Bin Laden is Dead!
Ed Schultz Fired Up!
the operation
Politics of death.
Executing the operation
Remembering the fallen.
Lawrence O'Donnell
Ground Zero
Pakistan
Bi-Partisan Dinner
Rhetorical Coolness. Just Desserts.
The Rewrite.
Monday, May 02, 2011
President Obama, No Osama.
MSNBC
CNN
FOX
CBC
Let's MoveOn!
Mean While
Thanks to some friends of Facebook for some of these, and some I thankfully don't use.**
Huffington Post
You Tube
C-Span
Salon
[Think Progress]
[Center for American Progress]
[Center for America's Future]
In defense of FOX News, a caller to the Stephanie Miller Show, claimed that there was absolutely no mention of President Obama on their home page. That is not correct. He is noted 4 times. And the video and transcript of his announcement about bin Laden are one of those, the second is a generic label for "In The News", the third an All-Star Panel on his emergency response, and the last an expose on "the one" letter difference between Obama and Osama. (Now Six*)
Navigational hint: go to bold links for Presidential material.
Speaking of live blogging: FOX Ups the Anti.
KARL ROVE: After Bin Laden's Death, President Obama's Next ...
[*] appropriately inserted last
[**] or rather last... noting the FOX Terrorist Threat, I am reminded of some inconvenient unfinished sentences or unintended sends of my own(De NO RAH O'Donnell tweet), but I mean reAlly?
FYI:
The news broke to me in just the right manner, straight from President Obama on the late night news. But if I had been online... Or a tweeter?
[***] celebrations
[Parting Shot?: Thom Hartmann has Gareth Porter on for some history. The point(Porter's) is that President Bush had no plan or intent to get bin Laden, not necessarily embedded in these links. My point is that Osama bin Laden could have been old news in 2001 but for the grace of Bush. If we had had different Pre-9-11 thinking, we could have had more justice and less tragedy and cost.]
[Updates: Ledes, Links and Labels added]
that Osama bin Laden has been killed.
Awe at the amount[*] of celebrations[***] that have sprung up.
UPDATES AS DATED:
Tuesday, May 03, 2011
President Obama Announcement
Rachel Maddow , National Outpouring
Temporal Importance
[Daily KOS
The Telegraph McCain and Bush Too.]
Slate: How White House kept a secret.
MSNBC Pakistan "Double Game"
Today Show Yesterday Bin Laden is Dead!
Ed Schultz Fired Up!
the operation
Politics of death.
Executing the operation
Remembering the fallen.
Lawrence O'Donnell
Ground Zero
Pakistan
Bi-Partisan Dinner
Rhetorical Coolness. Just Desserts.
The Rewrite.
Monday, May 02, 2011
President Obama, No Osama.
MSNBC
CNN
FOX
CBC
Let's MoveOn!
Mean While
Thanks to some friends of Facebook for some of these, and some I thankfully don't use.**
Huffington Post
You Tube
C-Span
Salon
[Think Progress]
[Center for American Progress]
[Center for America's Future]
In defense of FOX News, a caller to the Stephanie Miller Show, claimed that there was absolutely no mention of President Obama on their home page. That is not correct. He is noted 4 times. And the video and transcript of his announcement about bin Laden are one of those, the second is a generic label for "In The News", the third an All-Star Panel on his emergency response, and the last an expose on "the one" letter difference between Obama and Osama. (Now Six*)
Navigational hint: go to bold links for Presidential material.
Speaking of live blogging: FOX Ups the Anti.
KARL ROVE: After Bin Laden's Death, President Obama's Next ...
[*] appropriately inserted last
[**] or rather last... noting the FOX Terrorist Threat, I am reminded of some inconvenient unfinished sentences or unintended sends of my own(De NO RAH O'Donnell tweet), but I mean reAlly?
FYI:
The news broke to me in just the right manner, straight from President Obama on the late night news. But if I had been online... Or a tweeter?
[***] celebrations
[Parting Shot?: Thom Hartmann has Gareth Porter on for some history. The point(Porter's) is that President Bush had no plan or intent to get bin Laden, not necessarily embedded in these links. My point is that Osama bin Laden could have been old news in 2001 but for the grace of Bush. If we had had different Pre-9-11 thinking, we could have had more justice and less tragedy and cost.]
[Updates: Ledes, Links and Labels added]
Thursday, February 05, 2009
Wednesday, January 21, 2009
Who's counting?
Not Me, but Day Two?
Looking back..."before a crowd of more than a million people" speaking of correct order. I have pulled this from ThinkProgress.org.
But I would like to propose that given a comment that there was no counting the crowd on Inauguration day, that there never will be a way to definitely exceed but only as reference to future crowds. In that regard let us hope that there never is a more historic crowd, for it might mean we have revisited more troubled times. Yet that in effect might itself be less than optimistic for we must hope to meet and exceed that moment in time.
[Update significantly later: And Fear Knot for fear not. K(not)directly juxtapositioned.]
[Update 1:20 PM - cross s(words) - or translation Unknot fear for fear not.]
Looking back..."before a crowd of more than a million people" speaking of correct order. I have pulled this from ThinkProgress.org.
But I would like to propose that given a comment that there was no counting the crowd on Inauguration day, that there never will be a way to definitely exceed but only as reference to future crowds. In that regard let us hope that there never is a more historic crowd, for it might mean we have revisited more troubled times. Yet that in effect might itself be less than optimistic for we must hope to meet and exceed that moment in time.
[Update significantly later: And Fear Knot for fear not. K(not)directly juxtapositioned.]
[Update 1:20 PM - cross s(words) - or translation Unknot fear for fear not.]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)